Ignore the surveys — a new
tool is helping to predict elections
The aftermath of the 25
October election is as follows: happy faces in the group supporting Mauricio
Macri, worried faces in the Victory Front (FpV) crowd, and egg on the faces of
the pollsters who did an interesting job out of getting most of their forecasts
wrong.
A more private consequence for
many was an increase in calorie intake for the numerous Argentines who were
collecting their winnings and paying off their debts, as a result of gambles
they made on the outcome of the election.
“A dinner says that
(Macri/Scioli) wins on 25 October” was a phrase repeated in many social circles
over the last month.
A very Argentine tradition,
it’s bad for those watching their weight but with great benefits in terms of
amusement, friendships and socializing.
Whilst Argentines were
settling their particular gambling debts, in the United States a more
institutional commemoration was taking place. The “PredictIt” organization
celebrated its first year in business. (http://www.predictit.org/)
This is the latest tool available
for political practitioners. In its own words, PredictIt “is a new real money
game that tests your knowledge of political and financial events by letting you
make and trade predictions.” And this organization is not the brainchild of a
Wall Street broker. It is a project of the Victoria University, in Wellington,
New Zealand, which was “set up to research the potential value of prediction
markets in understanding the future.”
For good measure, the people
from PredictIt end their presentation with the enticing line: “Our job is to
study the wisdom of the crowds, yours is to make you most educated prediction.”
The “game” is quite simple.
Predictions about future events are formalized by buying shares in the outcome,
either “Yes” or “No.” Each outcome has a probability of between one percent and
99 percent, with the sum of the two always naturally adding to 100 percent. And
these percentages are then converted into US cents.
This is not a high-stakes
betting game. The limits are quite low and the money element is a device to
encourage players to play rather than being the object of the business. The
highest possible single deal is currently US$850. In fact, its 37,000 members
have traded a total of approximately US$10 million, which averages out to about
U$S270 per individual.
The object of the exercise is
orientated toward research, in as much as prediction markets like this one are
attracting a lot of academic and practical interest. And, perhaps more
importantly, what happens in the PredictIt markets can have an immediate impact
on “real-life” politics.
Recently, staff of the US
Republican Party presidential candidate Jeb Bush learned this at their own
expense. They use PredictIt as one of the indicators about their candidate’s
chances. And when the predictions market indicated that Marco Rubio was ahead
of Bush in the Republican party race for the nomination, campaign donors
started to shy away. And in US politics at the moment, it seems easier to
recover from a temporary setback to your ranking in the game than from having
your donors looking for the exit door.
Fans in Wall Street
According to Bloomberg, the
case of Jeb Bush is not isolated. In their view, Wall Street donors (obviously,
amongst the biggest contributors to campaigns) look more at information offered
by the likes of PredictIt than at opinion polls. The view, held by many
economists, is that betting markets are more accurate in predicting political
events than opinion polls. Even if they have a lower number of participants.
Interestingly, this prediction
market offers numerous themes and options on which to bet that go way beyond
the US presidential race. Amongst the US topics open to prediction are if —
after the 2016 elections — the party which wins will be unified in government
and Congress. Which is possibly related to the primaries and their occasionally
bitter quarrels.
Or you can bet on whether a
law will be passed by Congress. On international matters, the market is open on
issues like whether Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro or Brazilian President
Dilma Rousseff will last out their terms in office. You can even bet on the
possibility of a woman becoming the next UN Secretary General.
But there appears to be no
Scioli-Macri option on PredictIt. It’s left to you ,dear reader, to imagine the
possible questions/options that could be offered around this issue — and the
odds.
CREDITS: BUENOS AIRES HERALD

No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario