Challenges
extend to differences between allies
Many people
argue that, despite imperfections, black spots and contradictions, Western
Europe’s democracy is the best, most advanced and humane political system on
earth. This writer agrees completely with that view.
The march
that took place yesterday in Paris shows that — despite differences — the main
leaders of these countries stand by that way of life and perceive last week’s
terrorist attacks in Paris as a very serious threat. The question is if the
threats faced by European democracy are limited to terrorist attacks from
specific fundamentalist groups. Or if it might be under both internal and
external pressures, not necessarily as violent as terrorism but clearly
challenging.
Right now,
the spotlight is on the Muslim population. A conservative estimate is that six
percent of the EU population adheres to Islam. The problem is that in some EU
member states, the popular perception is that such proportion is much higher.
In France, the eight percent Muslim population is perceived to be 31 percent.
In the UK, the real figure of five percent turns into 21 percent in people’s
imagination. The German psyche is more moderate. It thinks in terms of 19
percent of Muslims where there are only six percent. Consequently, it comes as
no surprise that ultra-right parties like France’s Front National or Great
Britain’s UK Independence Party are growing. And — in both cases — the Western
European way of life would be a primal target if those politicians came into
power.
To be
realistic, security agencies will have to increase their surveillance over
Islamist-related groups in the search of terrorists hiding in their midst. This
is never comfortable and mistakes will happen. With luck, they will be limited
to unnecessary harassment. But there could be — as has been the case already —
nastier incidents. It is a vicious circle where the search for the few
irritates the many, who, in turn, become more alienated from the authorities.
The management of surveillance and investigation on Muslim groups without
incurring in serious mistakes is — right now — a major challenge for European
governments.
But the
challenges are not only internal and limited to fighting terrorism.
The Western
European model is quite unique. Could it become isolated? Some will take
comfort from the presence of many non-European political leaders at yesterday’s
march. But cynics (realists?) will argue that some of the non-European leaders
who attended yesterday’s mass tribute in Paris, did so not because of their
commitment to this particular — and refined — type of democracy, but because EU
countries are still very relevant players, which merits positive signals in
critical situations like the one faced by France last week. And cynics will
further argue that, in spite of the global expressions of solidarity, realism
demands that the optimism triggered by the support offered by a number of
non-European countries’ heads of government or their ministers, is submitted to
some critical analysis.
Those
enamoured with EU main partners’ vision of democracy are, in global terms, a
minority, and have different levels of disagreement with rather important
countries. Take the case of China. Human Rights in China are a serious concern
for the EU. In a meeting which took place last month, the European side raised
issues like “the rights of persons belonging to minorities, especially in Tibet
and Xinjiang, freedom of religion or belief, freedom of expression (off-line
and on-line), freedom of peaceful assembly and association, the due process of
law, arbitrary detention, and the death penalty.” A list unlikely to make the
Chinese happy.
Then there
is Russia. European democracy goes well beyond using elections to choose
governments, so it is easy to add Russia to the list of countries which do not
share the values of Western Europe. The current confrontation over the Ukraine
crisis only makes matters worse.
In
addition, and risking strong controversy, even democratic US has strong
differences with the Europeans. Witness the espionage scandal leading to the
CIA station chief being kicked out of Germany last July. Not to mention the
fact that the US government’s pragmatism at the time of dealing with Islamist
fundamentalist groups which then boomerang as enemies makes some European Governments
quite unhappy.
In short,
the other big powers show various levels of difference from the Europeans’
democratic ideal. Which, in light of all this, seems to be a rare commodity. So
rare in fact, that it might need to take a new look at these other realities
and find a way to manage the differences.
@andresfederman
CREDITS: BUENOS AIRES HERALD

No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario