On September 25 the US Embassy’s Chargé d’Affaires
Kevin Sullivan welcomed two recently arrived members of his staff: Public
Affairs Officer Thomas Mesa and Assistant Cultural Affairs Officer Katherine
Ordóñez. In all likelihood, their posting in Buenos Aires (by the way, a
coveted destination in many diplomatic services) was decided months ago. But
new circumstances might mean that their workload will be heavier than that of
their predecessors.
It is quite obvious that the bilateral relation is far
from excellent or even good. And that — while the US is trying to tone down the
disagreements — the Argentine government is trying to be as vocal as possible
about them. Moreover, it does not seem likely that this state of affairs will
change in the near future. Even if it does, the damage done to the US image and
prestige in Argentine society will last longer than the intergovernmental spat
that caused it in the first place. Controlling the damage and (ideally)
reverting it, is a public diplomacy job. While traditional diplomacy is usually
a government-to-government affair, public diplomacy is about engaging with the
society of the host country, delivering messages, clearing misperceptions and
fostering cooperation. Despite their individual efforts, this is not the day to
day job of commercial or military attachés or even political councillors.
This is the job of people like Mr Mesa and Ms Ordóñez.
Both their jobs are at the core of any public diplomacy effort. So let us meet
them both with some bad news. For openers, anti-US feelings run quite high in
Argentina, despite the local craze to visit Miami and New York. According to a
recent opinion poll carried out by the Pew Research Centre only 36 percent of
Argentines have a favourable view of the US.
Then there is the fact that they have arrived at the
home of conspiracy theories. Many people find it difficult to accept that most
things happen without being masterminded by “hidden powers.” And —
unfortunately for the two recent arrivals — the US tops the league of those
“hidden powers.”
The saga of Judge Griesa’s rulings in favour of the
holdout / vulture funds is a good example of this. Many in the Argentine
government continue to accuse the White House and the State Department of being
in collusion against Argentina with Griesa and the plaintiffs. The fact that
the US government is on record trying to help Argentina, albeit respecting the
independence of the US judiciary, seems not to be registering. Never let facts
get in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
Although this environment might seem discouraging, the
bright side of public diplomacy work is that it is not about winning elections.
And that only in very rare occasions it is required to deliver messages or
influence the sum total of the population. In a world of scarce resources,
Embassies tend to target their audiences and their messages quite carefully.
And try to obtain results which are measurable in terms of quality and
quantity. One interesting example is the above mentioned matter of the alleged
collusion between the US Government and Judge Griesa. It is the kind of
misperception which, if allowed to survive, could harm the US image as a
business partner. Or harm the credibility of the US judiciary’s rulings in
matters affecting global politics. Especially in a country like Argentina,
where the independence of judges is such a sensitive issue. The target of
messages about this is quite specific, and includes the local judiciary as well
as current and future leaderships.
Another point in which the US Government is likely to
have to deliver clear messages is that of sovereign states’ debt restructuring.
Together with a number of countries, the US is opposing Argentina’s view that
the issue of debt restructuring should be regulated by the UN. The US view is that
international finance contains enough specialised elements so as to need the
intervention of technical organizations like the IMF rather than a simple aye
or nay at the UN. And because the IMF is many people’s demon of choice, to
deliver positive messages about the US position will not be easy. Again here,
there are specific audiences to be reached.
Finally, a note of colour to add to the newcomers’
concerns. Not-so-young people will recall that the late Juan Domingo Perón, the
most important (not necessarily the best) political leader in twentieth century
Argentina, was firmly convinced during many years that the world was governed
by a “synarchy” collectively ruled by The Vatican, Zionism, Communism,
Capitalism and — last but not least — the Freemasons. Fortunately for
Argentina, in the last years of his life he seemed to have abandoned this
theory. And today’s picture shows us that Moscow is not communist any more but
a coveted member of the BRICS, the association of Brazil, Russia, India, China
and South Africa which (in the mind of some of Argentine government followers)
is called to replace the US as a world power. And the Vatican now has an
Argentine pope so the pilgrimage of Argentine politicians seeking family photos
with Francis seems unstoppable. As for the Freemasons, they seem to have faded
away from conspiracies.
So this is a point to celebrate. Possibly over some
good beef and wine, another of the privileges of being posted in Argentina. Provided, of course, you
are not a vegetarian.
CREDITS: BUENOS AIRES HERALD

No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario